What Is a Flight Instructor Rating?
What Is a Flight Instructor Rating? Guiding the Next Generation from the Right Seat Every skilled pilot flying the skies today started the same way—beside an instructor. Flight i
What’s the Difference?
Understanding Your Options for Flying Under the IFR Rules in Australia
Not all instrument ratings are created equal, and for private pilots in Australia, knowing the distinction could change how, when, and where you fly.
The Private Instrument Rating (PIR) and the standard Instrument Rating (IR) both allow flight under Instrument Flight Rules (IFR), meaning you can legally fly in cloud or low visibility conditions. But they serve different purposes, with significant differences in training time, cost, privileges, and limitations.
This guide breaks down the differences between PIR and IR, explaining who they’re for, what’s involved in the training, and how to decide which path fits your goals.
The Private Instrument Rating (PIR) is designed for recreational or private pilots who want the flexibility to fly in non-visual conditions, without undergoing the full commercial-style training of a standard Instrument Rating.
It’s a streamlined IFR qualification, tailored to those flying under a Private Pilot Licence (PPL). The PIR allows you to conduct IFR flights in suitable airspace but comes with a few restrictions. For example, night IFR and certain airspace classes may be off-limits depending on your aircraft and navigation equipment.
Ideal use cases:
The standard Instrument Rating is the gold standard for IFR flight in Australia. Whether you’re aiming to become a commercial pilot or just want maximum flexibility as a private pilot, the full IR provides broad privileges under all instrument conditions.
It’s available in both single-engine and multi-engine versions and is required for those holding a Commercial Pilot Licence (CPL) or seeking an Air Transport Pilot Licence (ATPL). Unlike the PIR, this rating allows night IFR, full access to controlled airspace, and fewer equipment-based restrictions.
The IR is ideal for:
The PIR typically involves fewer flight hours and simpler training components. It focuses on the practical essentials of IFR flight, including basic instrument navigation, holding patterns, and approaches.
In contrast, the full IR covers a wider scope:
Both ratings require a flight test, but the IR exam and checkride are more comprehensive.
While exact costs vary depending on the school and aircraft, here’s a rough breakdown:
Costs depend on factors such as aircraft type (single vs multi-engine), dual flight hours, simulator usage, instructor fees, and theory exam preparation.
PIR offers excellent value for private pilots needing some IFR capability without the time and expense of a full IR.
Ask yourself:
Choose PIR if: You’re a recreational or private pilot who wants practical IFR capability without excessive cost or time commitment.
Choose IR if: You’re pursuing a commercial aviation career, flying complex operations, or want maximum IFR freedom.
Both the PIR and the full IR open the skies when the weather closes in—but each rating is tailored to a different kind of pilot. Choosing the right one means knowing your flying goals and picking the training pathway that fits.
Ready to take the next step? Don’t just choose based on cost or convenience—choose the rating that unlocks the kind of flying you want to do.
Reach out to your flight school or instructor today to explore your IFR options and get ready to fly smarter, safer, and further.
1. Can I fly in bad weather with a Private Instrument Rating (PIR)?
Yes—but with some limitations. A PIR allows you to fly under Instrument Flight Rules (IFR), which means you can legally fly in cloud or low visibility. However, certain airspace, equipment requirements, and night IFR operations may be restricted unless you hold a full Instrument Rating.
2. Is the Private Instrument Rating recognised for commercial flying?
No. The PIR is designed for private pilots and cannot be used for commercial operations. If you plan to work as a pilot (e.g., charter, airline, or freight), you’ll need the full Instrument Rating as part of your CPL or ATPL pathway.
3. How long does it take to get a PIR compared to a full IR?
The PIR generally takes less time, often completed in 20–30+ flight hours, depending on your experience. The full IR requires more in-depth training and typically takes 40+ hours, including theory and practical components.
4. Can I upgrade from a PIR to a full IR later?
Absolutely. Many pilots start with a PIR to gain practical IFR experience, then upgrade to a full IR as their needs evolve. Previous IFR training and logged hours may count toward the full rating, reducing future training time.
5. Which rating is more cost-effective for private pilots?
For private and recreational pilots not pursuing a commercial career, the PIR is usually more cost-effective. It offers essential IFR privileges at a fraction of the training time and cost of a full IR, making it a smart choice for non-commercial flying in variable conditions.
What Is a Flight Instructor Rating? Guiding the Next Generation from the Right Seat Every skilled pilot flying the skies today started the same way—beside an instructor. Flight i
Is It Better to Be a Private or Commercial Pilot? The Sky Isn’t the Limit—You Are So you’ve got that itch to fly—but now you’re staring down two runways: private or comme
Benefits of the Cirrus SR22 Why the Cirrus SR22 Still Reigns Supreme In the fast-evolving world of general aviation, few aircraft have earned their stripes quite like the Cirrus SR
© All rights reserved by Avia Aviation Pty Ltd.
Get in touch with our team and we’ll get back to you within 24 hours
Get in touch with our team and we’ll get back to you within 24 hours